Is your cell phone dangerous, SAR

 

 

Feature Article: SAR level of cell phones

Is Your Cell Phone Dangerous?
The short answer is – we don’t really know.

(Scroll down to determine you cell phone models SAR level)

 

 

Some Interesting Facts about Cell Phones

 

SAR level

 

On July 18, 2005, CNN’s popular show Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees aired a segment in which the daughter of famed attorney Johnnie Cochran claimed cell phone usage played a part in her father’s early death. During the segment, Dr. Keith Black, Chief of Neurosurgery at Los Angeles’ Cedars Sinai Hospital affirmed his belief in the carcinogenic effects of cell phones. Dr. Black was quoted as saying, “My own belief is that there probably is a correlation between the use of cell phones and brain cancer, even though there’s no scientific proof…You know, this is a microwave antenna, so you’re essentially cooking the brain when you hold the receiver right next to your brain.

Although many research groups and doctors disagree with Dr. Black’s position, they acknowledge that there is no conclusive evidence to support either side of the issue and additional research must be done. A recent review of 26 leading reports on cell phone danger, found that, “Overall the reports acknowledge that exposure to low level RF [radiofrequency] fields may cause a variety of subtle biological effects on cells, animals and humans, particularly on brain activity during sleep, but the possibility of exposure causing adverse health effects remains unproven. Nevertheless, these reports suggest additional well-targeted, high quality research would be valuable to explore remaining uncertainties further.”3

Leading researcher Stefan Lonn, PhD in the spring 2005 National Brain Tumor Foundation newsletter, echoes this cautious sentiment. Dr. Lonn writes, “…concerns have been raised that use of [cell phone] technology has increased dramatically without sufficient understanding of potential adverse health effects.”4 The uncertainty of the health risks associated with cell phone emissions is troubling because of the vast number of people who use cell phones each day. Market analysts estimate that 175 million Americans own cell phones and a recent study by Scarborough Research found that 69 percent of New York households own at least one cell phone.5 As the World Health Organization warned, “Given the immense numbers of users of mobile phones, even small adverse effects on health could have major public health implications.”6 In the absence of conclusive evidence either way it is important that consumers can easily find information on the levels of emissions from their cell phones. This information allows them to make calculated risks and educated decisions about which phones to purchase and use.

 

 

 

What can I use to protect myself from cell phone radiation

 

 

 

 

 

SAR level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cell Phone SAR Levels listed by Manufacturer

 

What is the SAR Level

Back in 1996, in an effort to address growing concerns about cell phone emissions, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established radio frequency exposure guidelines for cell phones. They developed the term “SAR” or Specific Absorption Rate as a way of measuring the absorption of cell phone emissions into the body. The maximum legal SAR level in the United States is 1.6W/kg (watts per kilogram). SAR levels for cell phones typically range from .2W/kg and 1.58W/kg. Troublingly, information on SAR levels of popular cell phone models is not widely known or readily available. The FCC and the FDA joined forces to produce a website with links to cell phone manufacturers’ websites so consumers can look up the emission level of their cell phone. But the joint FCC/FDA website does not have a comprehensive list of SAR levels, and it is quite a tedious task to visit dozens of websites to compare SAR levels of different phones before purchasing one. There are non-governmental websites that list SAR levels for different phones, but most people don’t know about these sites, or do not trust the information because it does not come directly from the joint FCC/FDA website.

 

The following information was compiled from the websites of each major cell phone manufacturer and the information on SAR levels from the FCC and FDA-sponsored links. The SAR ratings for the most popular phone models, as of May 2005, listed by Manufacturer.

 

COMPANY MODEL #

IN THE EAR

ON THE BODY

Alcatel One Touch 153

0.77

n/a

Alcatel One Touch 155

0.65

n/a

Alcatel One Touch 156

0.65

n/a

Alcatel One Touch 300/301

1.02

1.48

Alcatel One Touch 310/311

0.6

0.9

Alcatel One Touch 320

0.77

1.12

Alcatel One Touch 331

0.49

0.72

Alcatel One Touch 332

0.43

0.63

Alcatel One Touch 355

0.59

0.88

Alcatel One Touch 500 Series

0.71

1.04

Alcatel One Touch 511

0.30

0.53

Alcatel One Touch 512

0.30

0.53

Alcatel One Touch 525

0.6

0.9

Alcatel One Touch 531

0.86

0.81

Alcatel One Touch 556

0.40

0.60

Alcatel One Touch 557

0.43

0.66

Alcatel One Touch 565

0.43

0.66

Alcatel One Touch 700

0.77

1.04

Alcatel One Touch 715

0.35

0.56

Alcatel One Touch 735/735i

0.57

0.81

Alcatel One Touch 756

0.5

0.8

Alcatel One Touch 757

0.5

0.8

Alcatel One Touch 835

0.75

1.20

Alcatel One Touch Club

1.25

0.87

Alcatel One Touch Easy

1.25

0.87

Alcatel One Touch Gum

1.25

0.87

Alcatel One Touch Max

1.25

0.87

Alcatel One Touch View

1.35

0.96

AlcatelOne Touch302/303/304

1.0

1.45

Kyocera SE44

1.49

n/a

LG 4NE1

1.28

n/a

LG A7110

0.71

n/a

LG C1300

0.71

n/a

LG C330W

0.6698

n/a

LG F9100

0.72

n/a

LG G4010

0.714

n/a

LG G4011

0.7

n/a

LG G4015

0.71

n/a

LG G4050

0.71

n/a

LG L1150

1.45

n/a

LG L1200

0.71

n/a

LG LX1200

0.83

n/a

LG LX5350

1.38

n/a

LG LX5450

1.1

n/a

LG LX5550

1.21

n/a

LG MM-535

0.36

n/a

LG PM-225

0.90

n/a

LG PM-325

0.95

n/a

LG TM510

0.998

n/a

LG TP1100

1.39

n/a

LG TP2110

1.2

n/a

LG TP3000

1.41

n/a

LG TP5200

0.73

n/a

LG TP5250

0.839

n/a

LG V111

1.243

n/a

LG VI-125

0.99

n/a

LG VI5225

0.6

n/a

LG VX1

1.24

n/a

LG VX10

1.24

n/a

LG VX2000

1.28

n/a

LG VX3100

1.27

n/a

LG VX3100L

1.27

n/a

LG VX3200

1.17

n/a

LG VX3300

1.1

n/a

LG VX4400

1.0

n/a

LG VX4500

1.17

n/a

LG VX4600

1.22

n/a

LG VX4700

1.14

n/a

LG VX6000

1.32

n/a

LG VX6100

0.93

n/a

LG VX7000

1.27

n/a

LG VX8000

0.865

n/a

LG VX8100

1.16

n/a

LG VX9000

1.33

n/a

Mitsubishi A008

0.74

n/a

Mitsubishi A1000

0.74

n/a

Mitsubishi A760

0.96

n/a

Mitsubishi A768

0.96

n/a

Mitsubishi A780

0.74

n/a

Mitsubishi A830

0.69

n/a

Mitsubishi A835

0.55

n/a

Mitsubishi A840

0.93

n/a

Mitsubishi A860

0.93

n/a

Mitsubishi A920

0.75

n/a

Mitsubishi A925

0.65

n/a

Mitsubishi C155

0.82

n/a

Mitsubishi C156

0.82

n/a

Mitsubishi C200

0.78

n/a

Mitsubishi C250

0.83

n/a

Mitsubishi C300

0.83

n/a

Mitsubishi C331

0.81

n/a

Mitsubishi C332

0.81

n/a

Mitsubishi C333

0.81

n/a

Mitsubishi C336

0.81

n/a

Mitsubishi C350

0.81

n/a

Mitsubishi C380

0.73

n/a

Mitsubishi C381p

1.01

n/a

Mitsubishi C385

0.73

n/a

Mitsubishi C450

0.92

n/a

Mitsubishi C550

0.71

n/a

Mitsubishi C650

0.87

n/a

Mitsubishi C975

1.02

n/a

Mitsubishi C980

1.02

n/a

Mitsubishi E1000

0.88

n/a

Mitsubishi E375

0.62

n/a

Mitsubishi E375i

0.51

n/a

Mitsubishi E380

0.73

n/a

Mitsubishi E385

0.88

n/a

Mitsubishi E398

1.01

n/a

Mitsubishi E550

0.93

n/a

Mitsubishi E815

0.8

n/a

Mitsubishi L7089

0.93

n/a

Mitsubishi L7189

0.83

n/a

Mitsubishi M388

0.815

n/a

Mitsubishi MPX1800

0.29

n/a

Mitsubishi MPX200

0.12

n/a

Mitsubishi MPX220

0.58

n/a

Mitsubishi P389

1.07

n/a

Mitsubishi P389e

1.07

n/a

Mitsubishi P389i

0.95

n/a

Mitsubishi P8088

0.43

n/a

Mitsubishi RazrV3

0.62

n/a

Mitsubishi T180

0.64

n/a

Mitsubishi T190

0.92

n/a

Mitsubishi T191

1.01

n/a

Mitsubishi T192

0.87

n/a

Mitsubishi T205

0.93

n/a

Mitsubishi T2288

0.62

n/a

Mitsubishi T250

0.8

n/a

Mitsubishi T260

0.95

n/a

Mitsubishi T280

0.96

n/a

Mitsubishi T2801

0.96

n/a

Motorola A 388

0.737

0.58

Motorola A1000

0.73

0.55

Motorola A388c

0.737

0.58

Motorola A630 GSM1900

0.23

0.96

Motorola A630 GSM850/1900

0.59

1.26

Motorola A840

1.53

1.47

Motorola A845

1.51

0.41

Motorola A920

0.86

0.08

Motorola C150T

1.46

0.31

Motorola C210 (19000MHz)

1.43

0.4

Motorola C210 (800MHz)

1.23

0.67

Motorola C236

1.38

1.23

Motorola C331(GSM8/19)

1.09

0.58

Motorola C331(TDMA)

1.51

0.687

Motorola C332(CDMA)

1.58

0.6

Motorola C332(GSM8/19)

1.09

0.58

Motorola C332(TDMA)

1.51

0.687

Motorola C333(CDMA)

1.58

0.6

Motorola C333(GSM8/19)

1.09

0.58

Motorola C336(GSM8/19)

1.09

0.58

Motorola C340

1.45

0.68

Motorola C341(CDMA)

1.58

0.6

Motorola C343a

1.58

0.67

Motorola C350 (GSM850/1900) for Cingular

1.38

1.23

Motorola C350(GSM850/1900)

1.06

0.395

Motorola C650

1.4

0.62

Motorola CN620

1.49

1.37

Motorola E380 (900MHz/1800MHz)

0.73

0.18

Motorola E398

0.33

0.46

Motorola E680

0.34

0.34

Motorola E815

1.24

1.31

Motorola I1700 Plus

0.58

1.29

Motorola I2000

0.54

0.59

Motorola I2000 Plus

0.81

0.38

Motorola i205

1.19

1.39

Motorola i205e

1.19

1.39

Motorola i215

1.41

1.57

Motorola i265

1.16

1.38

Motorola i285

1.42

1.38

Motorola i305

1.46

1.16

Motorola i30sx

1.4

4.2

Motorola i315

1.45

1.26

Motorola i325

1.06

1.09

Motorola i325IS

1.06

1.09

Motorola i35S

1.4

0.42

Motorola I500 Plus

0.58

1.29

Motorola i50sx

1.36

0.46

Motorola i530

1.37

1.29

Motorola I550 Plus

0.58

1.29

Motorola i55sr

1.36

0.46

Motorola i58sr

1.21

0.85

Motorola i60c

1.15

1.2

Motorola i710

1.15

1.36

Motorola i720

1.15

1.36

Motorola i730

1.19

1.15

Motorola i736

1.19

1.15

Motorola i80s

1.37

0.6

Motorola i830

1.41

1.45

Motorola i830e

1.41

1.45

Motorola i833

1.41

1.45

Motorola i85s

1.36

0.46

Motorola i860

0.93

1.46

Motorola i88s

1.21

0.85

Motorola i90c

1.15

0.33

Motorola i95cl

1.15

0.33

Motorola i99cl

1.15

0.33

Motorola L7082

1.22

0.39

Motorola L7089

1.22

0.39

Motorola MPx200

0.2

1.06

Motorola MPx220

1.1

0.88

Motorola P7382

1.22

0.39

Motorola P7382i

1.22

0.39

Motorola P7389

1.22

0.39

Motorola P7389E

1.22

0.39

Motorola P7389I

1.22

0.39

Motorola P7689

1.22

0.39

Motorola P8090

1.08

1.4

Motorola P8090SI

1.08

1.4

Motorola P8097

1.31

1.58

Motorola P8160

1.15

0.87

Motorola P8190

1.08

1.4

Motorola P8197

1.31

1.58

Motorola P8767

1.18

0.58

Motorola r750

0.48

1.36

Motorola r750 Plus

0.48

1.36

Motorola Razor V3

0.89

0.58

Motorola ST 7760

1.15

0.87

Motorola ST 7790

1.08

1.4

Motorola ST 7790I

1.08

1.4

Motorola ST 7790SI

1.08

1.4

Motorola ST 7797

1.31

1.58

Motorola St 7860

1.15

0.87

Motorola St 7860W

1.15

0.87

Motorola ST7890

1.08

1.4

Motorola ST7897

1.31

1.58

Motorola T182

1.47

0.35

Motorola T182c

1.47

0.35

Motorola T193

0.62

0.64

Motorola T2260

1.15

0.6

Motorola T2290

1.1

0.35

Motorola T2390

1.1

0.35

Motorola T250

1.22

0.39

Motorola T280

1.41

0.684

Motorola T280i

1.41

0.684

Motorola T300P

1.52

0.77

Motorola T720(CDMA)

1.56

1.3

Motorola T720(GSM8/19)

0.82

0.62

Motorola T720i(GSM8/19)

0.82

0.62

Motorola T730(CDMA)

1.56

1.3

Motorola T8090

1.08

1.4

Motorola T8090SI

1.08

1.4

Motorola T8097

1.31

1.58

Motorola T8160

1.15

0.87

Motorola T8190

1.08

1.4

Motorola T8197

1.31

1.58

Motorola Timeport 270C

1.33

0.63

Motorola V.100

0.14

0.04

Motorola V.101

0.14

0.04

Motorola V.120E

1.59

0.691

Motorola V.180

1.39

0.57

Motorola V.185

1.39

0.57

Motorola V.186

1.4

2.8

Motorola V.188

1.39

0.57

Motorola V.220

1.23

0.57

Motorola V.220i

1.23

0.57

Motorola V.2260

1.15

0.6

Motorola V.2290

1.1

0.35

Motorola V.2390

1.1

0.35

Motorola V.260

1.55

1.48

Motorola V.262

1.55

1.48

Motorola V.265

1.55

1.48

Motorola V.300

1.53

0.49

Motorola V.400

1.53

0.49

Motorola V.400p

1.53

0.49

Motorola V.505

1.4

1.04

Motorola V.510

1.48

1.14

Motorola V.551

1.4

0.57

Motorola V.600

1.4

1.04

Motorola V.60C

0.42

1.23

Motorola V.60G

0.63

0.36

Motorola V.60i Color (TDMA)

1.32

1.24

Motorola V.60i(TDMA)

1.32

1.24

Motorola V.60p

1.45

0.98

Motorola V.60s

1.45

0.66

Motorola V.60T

1.32

1.24

Motorola V.60v

1.56

0.48

Motorola V.60x

1.59

0.81

Motorola V.635

1.48

1.17

Motorola V.65p

1.45

0.98

Motorola V.66

1.49

0.89

Motorola V.70

1.54

0.43

Motorola V.710

1.41

1.27

Motorola V.80

0.24

0.54

Motorola V.810

1.48

1.14

Motorola V.8160

1.51

0.75

Motorola V.8162

1.35

0.28

Motorola V120C

1.55

1.41

Nokia 1221

1.19

1.06

Nokia 2116i

1.20

1.03

Nokia 2285

1.15

0.99

Nokia 3200

0.46

0.95

Nokia 3205

1.29

0.70

Nokia 3220

0.57

0.83

Nokia 6010

1.08

0.73

Nokia 6015i

1.28

1.00

Nokia 6019i

1.28

1.00

Nokia 6170

1.12

1.09

Nokia 6225i

1.27

0.78

Nokia 6230

0.76

1.11

Nokia 6620

1.16

0.74

Nokia 6670

0.42

0.58

Nokia 6800

1.20

1.02

Nokia 7280

0.71

0.75

Nokia 7610

0.90

0.88

Nokia 9500

0.94

1.53

Panasonic EBTX210

1.47

0.93

Panasonic EBTX220

1.41

0.29

Sanyo MM-5600

0.72

n/a

Sanyo MM-7400

0.95

n/a

Sanyo MM-8300

0.89

n/a

Sanyo PM-8200

1.01

n/a

Sanyo RL-4920

1.13

n/a

Sanyo RL7300

0.97

n/a

Sanyo SCP-200

1.18

n/a

Sanyo SCP-3000

0.5811

n/a

Sanyo SCP-310

1.37

n/a

Sanyo SCP-400

1.35

n/a

Sanyo SCP-4500

1.4

n/a

Sanyo SCP-4700

1.39

n/a

Sanyo SCP-4900

1.3

n/a

Sanyo SCP-5000

0.657

n/a

Sanyo SCP-5150

1.1309

n/a

Sanyo SCP-5300

1.41

n/a

Sanyo SCP-5400

1.16

n/a

Sanyo SCP-6000

1.28

n/a

Sanyo SCP-6200

1.4597

n/a

Sanyo SCP-6400

0.926

n/a

Sanyo SCP-7200

1.4

n/a

Sanyo SCP-8100

1.37

n/a

Sanyo VI-2300

1.28

n/a

Sanyo VM4500

1.25

n/a

Siemens A55

0.56

n/a

Siemens A57

0.46

n/a

Siemens A60

0.67

n/a

Siemens A62

0.49

n/a

Siemens A65

0.49

n/a

Siemens A70

0.42

n/a

Siemens A75

0.49

n/a

Siemens AX75

0.33

n/a

Siemens C55

0.49

n/a

Siemens C60

0.67

n/a

Siemens C62

0.72

n/a

Siemens C65

0.73

n/a

Siemens C70

0.73

n/a

Siemens CF62

0.75

n/a

Siemens CF75

0.798

n/a

Siemens CFX65

0.699

n/a

Siemens CX65

0.59

n/a

Siemens CX70

0.67

n/a

Siemens CX75

0.613

n/a

Siemens M55

0.64

n/a

Siemens M65

0.88

n/a

Siemens M75

0.44

n/a

Siemens MC60

0.67

n/a

Siemens S55

0.53

n/a

Siemens S65

0.48

n/a

Siemens SF65

0.38

n/a

Siemens SK65

0.58

n/a

Siemens SL55

0.62

n/a

Siemens SL65

0.58

n/a

Siemens SP 65

0.48

n/a

Siemens ST55

0.74

n/a

Siemens ST60

0.47

n/a

Siemens SX1

0.52

n/a

Siemens U10

0.98

n/a

Siemens U15

0.35

n/a

Sony Erickson K500i

0.65

1.39

Sony Erickson K700i

0.37

1.03

Sony Erickson P900

1.01

0.45

Sony Erickson P910a

1.50

0.97

Sony Erickson S700i

0.42

0.16

Sony Erickson S710a

0.883

0.578

Sony Erickson T226

1.18

0.75

Sony Erickson T237

1.18

0.75

Sony Erickson T290a

1.18

0.75

Sony Erickson T610

1.21

0.97

Sony Erickson T616

1.16

0.71

Sony Erickson T630

0.83

0.63

Sony Erickson T637

1.14

1.04

Sony Erickson Z550a

1.45

0.97

 

 Samsung SAR information can be found in each phone's user guide.

 Audiovox SAR information can be found in each phone's user guide.

 Kyocera SAR information can be found in each phone's user guide

 

 

 

Radiation Protection for Cell Phone Users

3 Step Solution

 
 

1. The Problem: 

Cell Phone Radiation is Dangerous

CBS News reports: Cell Phone Tumor Link Found

"use of cell phone for at least 10 years might increase their risk of developing a rare benign tumor along a nerve on the side of the head where they hold the phone "   

Reuters reports: Cell phone use increases brain tumor risk by 240 percent

"study found that extensive usage of the cell phone over the duration of a long period of time increases the risk of developing a brain tumor by 240 percent

Dr. George Carlo reports: The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Radiation

by Dr. George L. Carlo of the Science and Public Policy Institute.

 
 

2. The Solution: 

Block harmful cell phone radiation with the proven Safe Cell Tab

SPECIAL OFFER BUY 2 GET 3rd FREE

 

BUY NOW!

 
     
 

3. The Proof: 

The Safe Cell Tab is a Scientifically Proven Solution

A Shielding Effectiveness Test was conducted by The California Institute of Material Sciences. The test results proved that "The Safe Cell Tab possesses Shielding Effectiveness in the test frequency range 0.800 GHz to 10.525 GHz"

 
   
 

The Safe Cell Tab has a 100% satisfaction guarantee

If you are not completely satisfied, return within 30 days for a full refund

 

visit www.safecell.net for information on our radiation protection technology!

 

Distributed by CT Marketing
112-936 Peace Portal Drive, Blaine, WA 98230
Questions? E-MAIL us for more information